Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 Md. 178 - State v. Denten Corp.

State v. Denten Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Georgia · Freedman v. Maryland · Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. · Grosjean v. American Press Co. · Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to the very narrow problem area under discussion, which assumes that the sole copy of a motion picture film has been seized, and which further assumes that the person from whom it was taken applies to have the sole copy delivered to the Board of Motion Picture Censors for review or desires to have a copy made for such a submission, we interpret Art. 27, § 551(c)(1) to permit honoring the request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““brought to an abrupt halt an orderly and presumptively legitimate distribution or exhibition .... Such precipitate action by a police officer, without the authority of a constitutionally sufficient warrant, is plainly a form of prior restraint and is, in those circumstances, unreasonable under Fourth Amendment standards.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.