Moe v. Alsop’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably In Re Candidacy of Daly (1972), Peterson v. Stafford (1992)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. McGrath v. Erickson · State ex rel. Olson v. Scott · Touhey v. Donovan · State Ex Rel. Beck v. Erickson · State ex rel. Sauer v. District Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any individual may file a petition * * * for the correction of * * * (a) An error or omission in the placement or printing of the name or description of any candidate or any question on any official ballot; * * * [[Image here]] The petition shall be filed with * * * any judge of the district court in that county in the case of an election for county, municipal, or school district office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schiff v. Griffin“An application for an order preventing the placement of a candidate’s name upon an election ballot for any office must be timely made and clearly established. The burden upon .the applicant to establish ineligibility must be a heavy one in view of the drastic nature of an affirmative order, both to the candidate and to the electorate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Studer v. Kiffmeyer““Senators and representatives shall be qualified voters of the State, and shall have resided one year in the State and six months immediately preceding the election in the district from which they are elected.” (Italics supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Parsons v. Hickey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.