Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 P.3d 752 - Vent v. State

Vent v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc. · United States v. O'Keefe · Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc. · United States v. Burrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n objection is not required to preserve an issue for appeal if the appealing party had no opportunity to make an objection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) generally known within this state or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.