Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 288 Pa. 140 - Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.

Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
December 1983
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 1983 · most notably Hartig v. American Ice Co. (1927), Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co. (1928)

3 federal appellate · 77 state decisions

4601926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. · Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co. · McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co. · Travellers' Ins Co v. McConkey · Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““if the evidence relied on by the claimant was one-sided and conclusively showed a self-inflicted injury or suicide .... Here, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the award in [claimant’s] favor entirely lacks evidential support; no more can it be held that the evidence relied on by the other side [to rebut the presumption against suicide] is ‘so clear, positive, credible, and uncontradicted,’ or so ‘indisputable in weight’ as to justify the court below in holding that the employer had sustained the burden put on it....” Id. at 288 Pa. 149 -50, 135 A. at 907 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.