Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

288 S.C. 136

341 S.E.2d 631

State v. Harkness

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 1986

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1986-03-17

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2007

6 state decisions

Relies on State v. Plemmons · State v. Scipio · State v. Lawson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-03-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1 Appellant was convicted of robbery and petit larceny and sentenced to ten years and thirty days consecutively. We affirm the conviction and sentence for robbery but reverse the larceny conviction and vacate the sentence.

¶2 The testimony at trial showed that appellant and another man approached the prosecuting witness in a parking lot, grabbed and shoved her, jerked off both her necklaces, and knocked her down. Although it is apparent that appellant committed both robbery and the lesser-included offense of larceny, punishment for both offenses arising out of the same incident is double jeopardy. State v. Lawson, 279 S. C. 266, 305 S. E. (2d) 249 (1983).

¶3 Accordingly, the conviction for petit larceny is reversed and the sentence vacated, and the conviction and sentence for robbery are affirmed. State v. Plemmons, 286 S. C. 78, 332 S. E. (2d) 765 (1985); State v. Scipio, 283 S. C. 124, 322 S. E. (2d) 15 (1984).

/288/sc/136 · .json · Public domain