Temple v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on May v. State · Sherman v. State · 253 So. 2d 806 - Barrett v. State · 258 So. 2d 254 - Fairchild v. State · 284 So. 2d 523 - Grantham v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The essential elements of embezzlement are set out in May v. State, 240 Miss. 361 , 127 So.2d 423 (1961), as follows: The constituent elements of the offense are (1) an agent or trustee . (2) embezzling or converting to his own use, (3) . . . money, or other valuable . . property of any kind, (4) . intrusted to his care or possession by virtue of his position or employment. Code Sec. 2115; 18 Am. Jur., Embezzlement, Sec. 2. (240 Miss, at 363, 127 So.2d at 425 ). [ 288 So.2d at 838 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.