¶1 ORDER
¶2 Larue McQuary appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Mr. McQuary claims that the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion because he did not receive a fair trial due to a juror’s intentional nondisclosures during voir dire. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).