Morrison v. California

Jurisdictional statement submitted February li, 1933.

Decided February 20, 1933.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1933-02-20

Relies on Hem v. United States · Mobile Jackson Kansas City Railroad Company v. J a Turnipseed · Joseph Patsone v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-02-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1983

9 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, of California.

¶2Per Curiam:

¶3The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U. S. 35, 42, 43; Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U. S. 178, 183-185; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U. S. 502. (2) Cockrill v. California, 268 U. S. 258, 261, 262; Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U. S. 225, 232, 233; Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U. S. 138, 144. Mr. J. Marion Wright for appellants. No appearance for appellee.