Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Connell v. State (1974), 383 So. 2d 547 - Williams v. State (1979)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bridges v. State · Knight v. State · 41 Ala. App. 54 - White v. State · 16 Ala. App. 185 - Malone v. State · Winters v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“”(Q) Now Curtis Ward, you know that you are under Oath? “(A) Yes Sir. “(Q) Do you know what perjury is? “(A) What is it? “(Q) If you tell something that is not true in answer to a question that I am fixing to ask you, it’s perjury. Do you know that? “(A) No, I didn’t. “(Q) Do you know that for telling something that is not true after you are under oath that you can go to the Penitentiary for twenty years ? “(A) I didn’t know that. “Mr. Herring: Judge that is a legal point to be- “Mr. Baxley: Your Honor, this is cross examination. “Mr. Herring: Well the District Attorney is- “The Court: It is cross examination and I will allow him to go into it. “Mr. Herring: Well, I move that the Court inform the Witness of the perjury business. “Mr. Baxley: We would like the Court to inform him as to perjury, yes, sir. “The Court: Give me the statute. Now, under the law of Alabama, the Statute says: That any person who willfully and corruptly swears or affirm in regard to any material matter or thing on the trial of any person under an indictment for a felony shall on conviction be imprisoned in the Penitentiary for not less than three nor more than twenty years: Do you understand that? “(A) I do. “The Court: All right if you understand that, go ahead. “(Q) Now, Joe Curtis, actually what happened, when you all came back, this defendant and Willie Mae Higgins came over to that house and told you all that they had robbed that old man, didn’t they? “(A) Not as I know of. “(Q) You did not hear h”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Turner v. State““The purpose of objection and exception is to challenge the correctness of the action of the court so that such action may be corrected by the court itself, if deemed erroneous, and to lay the foundation for review, if necessary, by the appellate tribunal. Without such objection, the trial court ordinarily has the right to assume that its action is acquiesced in and free from error.” Turner v. State, 289 Ala. 97, 100 , 265 So.2d 883 (1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State“The latitude and extent of cross-examination, of necessity, is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, and, in the absence of prejudicial abuse, it is not reviewable on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ashurst v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.