Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 Ark. 234 - State v. Scott

State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2000

8 state decisions

60198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penn v. State · Newberry v. State · Brace v. Busboon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We emphasize that we do not open the door to other petitions [for writ of coram nobis] beyond those that would qualify under the facts in this case, especially the fact that it is presently between trial and. appeal and can easily provide for an early hearing before the court that just heard the case. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.