Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 Conn. 586 - State v. Blake

State v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2025

14 state decisions

60200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fabricatore · State v. Strickland · State v. Rivers · 89 Conn. App. 729 - State v. Fabricatore · 108 Conn. App. 336 - State v. Blake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state's stipulation and the court's representation, there is nothing to suggest that the defendant was not provided a full and fair opportunity to exercise [his] right [of allocution].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when it denied his request for a continuance of the dispositional phase of the violation of probation hearing to wait for a final resolution of the underlying criminal charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the right to allocution can be used effectively to influence a judge's discretion ... the opportunity to allocate must be meaningful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.