289 Conn. 913
Decided September 10, 2008
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2008-09-10
Relies on 108 Conn. App. 644 - Krichko v. Krichko
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-09-10
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2023
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn. App. 644 (AC 27691), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs obligation to pay alimony terminated upon the commencement of the defendant’s cohabitation with an unrelated adult male?”
¶2SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.