289 Conn. 943
Decided October 30, 2008
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2008-10-30
Relies on 109 Conn. App. 611 - State v. Tunick
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-10-30
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2022
1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn. App. 611 (AC 28461), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant’s conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?”
¶2NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.