Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.1d 740 - Ewert v. Robinson

Ewert v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

289 F. 740 · 1923

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1979

12 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

60192319301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co. · Dickerson v. Colgrove · Holland v. Challen · Frost v. Spitley · The President Recorder and Trustees of the City of Cincinnati v. The Lessee of Edward White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These things relate to a far-distant past. They are strangers to the jurisprudence of the United States. The modern tendency of jurisprudence is to look through shadows to substance — to eliminate technicalities in the interest of substantial justice. It is no longer necessary to go upon land as in the days of old and receive a twig or a clod of dirt as a token of changed possession. ... In the more modern doctrine of ejectment, entry is not a prerequisite to the action, and if the lessee has such interest in the property as gives a present right of possession, it is immaterial whether he has entered into possession before bringing the action. The right of entry, not the entry itself — the right of possession, not actual possession — are the essentials of an action in ejectment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.