Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.1d 858 - Huff v. Ford

Huff v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

289 F. 858 · 1923

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2013

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

101923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Boyce's Executors v. Felix Grundy · Peter Wagner v. John Baird · Bowen v. Chase · Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Matiken · Smithson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.