Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.1d 9 - Beam v. Hamilton

Beam v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

289 F. 9 · 1923

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 1965
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1965

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

8019231930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lehnen v. Dickson · Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co. · Vicksburg Ry Co v. Andersontully Co

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.