Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.2d 174 - Rego

Rego’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 1979
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. McKay · Columbia Properties, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners · United States v. Minker · Ceballos v. Shaughnessy · United States v. Hoellger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the important feature of this section is the distinction made between aliens admitted for “permanent residence” and aliens who remained in the United States in a status other than that of a permanent resident. Permanent resident aliens were treated like citizens in that they had the same unqualified obligation to render military service as did citizens. Only aliens not in permanent residence were privileged to be relieved of military service if they so requested. Id. at 176-177 (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That any male alien * * * who has remained in the United States in a status other than that of a permanent resident for a period exceeding one year * * * shall be liable for training and service in the Armed Forces * * * except that any such alien shall be relieved from [such] liability * * * if, prior to his induction into the Armed Forces he has made application to be relieved from such liability * * (Emphasis ours.) Page 176.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““For present purposes we assume, but do not decide, that any status of ineligibility which arose before 1952 under the earlier statute would persist despite the retroactive language of Section 315(a) of the 1952 Act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.