Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.2d 177 - National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.

National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.2d 177 · 1961

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
June 1995
most recently cited

65 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 1995 · most notably Jas. H. Matthews & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (1965), Florida Steel Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross (1976)

65 federal appellate ·

4001961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. · Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. United Steelworkers of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. There is nothing in Cabot Carbon, or in the Labor Management Act, or in any other law that makes it wrong for an employer”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A no solicitation rule applicable to employees during their non-working time unlawfully interferes with their right to discuss self-organization among themselves, unless the employer proves special circumstances that make such a restriction necessary to maintain production or discipline. No contention is made in this case of the existence of any such special circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bona fide, socially desirable employee committee(s) or joint employer-employee committee(s) that (are) something less than a labor organization and something more than a Great Books Study Group”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.