Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.2d 234 - Frierson v. Rogers

Frierson v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.2d 234 · 1961

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
October 1994
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 1994 · most notably Smith v. Blackwell (1966), Scanio v. United States (1994)

23 federal appellate ·

1501961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schiffman v. Wilkinson · Singleton v. Looney · Wooten v. Wilkinson · Mandel v. Heritage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] prisoner having served his term ... less good-time deductions shall, upon release, be deemed as if released on parole until the expiration of the maximum term ... for which he was sentenced....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “good time is a conditional right that may be forfeited upon violation of the conditions of the prisoner's release.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * to serve all or any part of the remainder of the term for which he was sentenced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.