Becker v. Webcor, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
289 F.2d 357 · 1961
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102
Relies on Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co. · Fritz W. Glitsch & Sons, Inc. v. Wyatt Metal & Boiler Works · Kiwi Coders Corporation and James G. McKay v. Acro Tool & Die Works and Alfred J. Farkas, 1 · Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. of America v. Sel-O-Rak Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““there is no material difference between the two.” See Becker v. Webcor, Inc., 7 Cir., 289 F.2d 357, 361 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““substantially identical to the prior art””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.