Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

289 F.2d 927

Docket No. 18642.

Harrison v. Phillips

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-05-09

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1982

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Harrison v. Phillips

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joseph Jaworski, Joe H. Reynolds, Houston, Tex., Dewey S. Walker, Pasadena, Tex., Bracewell, Reynolds & Patterson, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellant.

Raymond N. Zagone, Roger P. Marquis, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Edward Williams, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., William B. Butler, U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Arthur L. Moller, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The district court granted a motion of the defendant, who is appellee here, to dismiss the appellant's complaint on the ground that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Harrison v. Phillips, D.C., 185 F.Supp. 204. We are in agreement with the conclusion reached by the district court and its judgment is affirmed.

/289/f2d/927 · .json · Public domain