Uspango v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
289 F.3d 226 · 2002
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well-established that an alien at an immigration hearing has some form of right to counsel. It is equally well-settled, though, that 'there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel in deportation hearings.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must show that he was prevented from reasonably presenting his case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[the petitioner] gave up no rights . . . nor did [the government] receive any benefits from [the petitioner's action]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.