Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.3d 417 - Prater

Prater’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably 250 F. Supp. 2d 961 - Vineyard Christian Fellowship of Evanston, Inc. v. City of Evanston (2003), Jocham v. Tuscola County (2003)

2 district · 8 state decisions

260200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Conley v. Gibson · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · United States v. Salerno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [A] zoning or landmarking law, or the application of such a law, that limits or restricts a claimant's use or development of land (including a structure affixed to land), if the claimant has an ownership, leasehold, easement, servitude, or other property interest in the regulated land or a contract or option to acquire such an interest.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(C) the substantial burden is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations, under which a government makes, or has in place formal or informal procedures or practices that permit the government to make, individualized assessments of the proposed uses for the property involved.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.