Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.3d 434 - General Star National Insurance Company v. Administratia Asigurarilor Stat

General Star National Insurance Company v. Administratia Asigurarilor Stat’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.3d 434 · 2002

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
7
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Oj Distributing Inc v. Hornell Brewing Company Inc (2003), Highlands Wellmont Health Network, Inc. v. John Deere Health Plan, Inc. (2003)

13 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

250200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba · United States v. Berkowitz · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily Distajo · Menorah Insurance Company Ltd v. Inx Reinsurance Corporation Menorah Insurance Company Ltd · MicroStrategy, Inc. v. Lauricia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party may waive the right by delaying its assertion to such an extent that the opposing party incurs actual prejudice.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “chose not to invoke arbitration from July 1992 until October 1993 and [the plaintiff] bore the costs of proceeding to try to obtain the sums it thought owed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.