Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.3d 503 - Southern Union Co. v. Missouri Public Service Commission

Southern Union Co. v. Missouri Public Service Commission’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.3d 503 · 2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2020

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

100200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Edgar v. Mite Corp. · Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. New York State Liquor Authority · Healy v. Beer Institute · C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he regulation of utilities is one of the most important functions traditionally associated with the police powers of the States”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “). Here, out-of-state companies can benefit from Minn. Stat. § 216B.246 on the same terms as a Minnesota company. For the above reasons, the Court concludes that LSP has failed to demonstrate that Minn. Stat. § 216B.246 discriminates against out-of-state entities. 8 C. Pike Test LSP argues that even if Minn. Stat. § 216B.246 regulates evenhandedly, it violates the Commerce Clause under the Pike balancing test. Specifically, LSP claims that Minn. Stat. § 216B.246”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.