Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.3d 623 - Oliver v. Keller

Oliver v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.3d 623 · 2002

Citation profile

275
cited by 275 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2024
most recently cited

123 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 275 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Wilkins v. Gaddy (2010), Mitchell v. Horn (2003)

123 federal appellate · 7 district ·

2390200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Hudson v. McMillian · United States v. Gonzales · Harris v. Garner · Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 275 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(e) Limitation on recovery No Federal civil action may be brought by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility, for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “for all claims to which it applies, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) requires a prior showing of physical injury that need not be significant but must be more than de minimis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.