Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 F.3d 832 - Shields v. Norton

Shields v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

289 F.3d 832 · 2002

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably National Audubon Society, Inc. v. Davis (2002), LeClerc v. Webb (2003)

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

180200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (§ 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1540 (§ 11 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian Tribe · United Transportation Union v. Foster · Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Wolfe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Plaintiff's] claim that he stopped pumping water from the aquifer in response to [threats of litigation] might establish a controversy, if not for their emptiness exposed by years of inactivity since the alleged `threats' were made and the lack of evidence that a threat was in fact made[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “suit does not present justiciable issues and the district court was without jurisdiction to decide the case.” 10 . The Private Defendants argue that the Plaintiffs’ filing of a declaratory judgment action in this Court is a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be ripe for decision, meaning that it must not be premature or speculative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.