¶1 Arnold Lloyd Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 5:02-cr-30020-MFU-13 (W.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *661 and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.