289 F. Supp. 3d 287 - Devitri v. Cronen’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Goldberg v. Kelly · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have rejected Suspension Clause challenges [to jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the INA] on the ground that a motion to reopen plus a petition for review in the court of appeals would be an adequate substitute for habeas corpus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“removed back to the very country where they fear persecution and torture while awaiting a decision on whether they should be subject to removal because of their fears of persecution and torture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamama v. Adducci“persuasive evidence demonstrating that it is likely that the BIA will not rule on their non-emergency motions to stay before they are deported.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hamama v. Adducci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.