Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 Ill. App. 3d 465 - Yoder v. People

289 Ill. App. 3d 465 - Yoder v. People’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2011

9 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 171 Ill. 2d 230 - Boaden v. Department of Law Enforcement · 155 Ill. 2d 188 - People v. Bole · 166 Ill. 2d 165 - First of America Bank, Rockford, N.A. v. Netsch · 275 Ill. App. 3d 64 - Klem v. First National Bank of Chicago · 196 Ill. App. 3d 413 - People v. Click

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although we *** believe that it would have been appropriate for the court to make inquiry of petitioner in this case, given the history which the court and petitioner shared and the very recent determination that he was not capable of waiving counsel and proceeding pro se, we do not conclude that the court erred on this point. We would, however, suggest that the court be more careful in making such determinations in the future in order to minimize distress to the party seeking discharge and to delete at least one issue from the appeals that will arise from proceedings such as this one.” Yoder, 289 Ill. App. 3d at 471 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.