State v. Unterseher’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pfister · Kohler v. Stephens · State v. Bartkowski · Barnes County Education Ass'n v. Barnes County Special Education Board · State v. Folk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““12.1-05-11. Entrapment. — 1. It is an affirmative defense that the defendant was entrapped into committing the offense. “2. Entrapment occurs when a law enforcement agent induces the commission of an offense, using persuasion or other means likely to cause normally law-abiding persons to commit the offense. Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit an offense does not constitute entrapment. “3. In this section ‘law enforcement agent’ includes personnel of federal and local law enforcement agencies as well as state agencies, and any person cooperating with such an agency.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hoffman · State v. Mayer“1. A law enforcement agent induces the commission of the crime; and”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mayer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.