Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 NW2D 242 - State v. Teigen

State v. Teigen’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn · Gannett Co Inc v. A

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no justification for allowing a party less than one day to prepare to meet questions raised by an adversary on a motion. The State is entitled to a reasonable time to investigate the circumstances, prepare a response, and support the response with a brief and oral argument.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.