Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 NW2D 89 - State v. McCullum

State v. McCullum’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably State v. Wahlberg (1980), State v. Moore (1989)

37 state decisions

24019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Duvall v. United States · United States v. Fairchild · State v. Norgaard · State v. Swain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[i]f the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and for the necessity of overcoming it by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged, the court will not disturb its verdict.” The court will examine the evidence by viewing it in the light most favorable to the verdict * * *.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.