Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 Or. App. 602 - State v. Hickman

289 Or. App. 602 - State v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Davis · Wolf v. United States · State v. McAnulty · State v. Roble-Baker · 213 Or. App. 168 - State v. Holcomb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the nature of the initial [invocation and] violation, the amount of time between the violation and the [suspect's] later statements, whether the [suspect] remained in custody between the violation and the later statements, and whether there was a change in time and circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is limited, as we assume for purposes of this appeal, without deciding, that it was impermissible for the state to elicit and comment on McNeilly's testimony. Under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “). We therefore reject the state's assertion that defendant waived his previously invoked right to counsel. The state's final argument is that we should affirm denial of the suppression motion on a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.