289 So. 2d 468 - Gregory v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 207 So. 2d 294 - Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King · 240 So. 2d 163 - Maine Insurance v. Raser · 237 So. 2d 83 - Reicheck v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co. · 240 So. 2d 644 - Moore v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a situation such as this one, in which it is obvious that a defect in the appellate record may be quickly and easily corrected, it seems clear to us that the ends of justice are best served, and the litigant's constitutional right to effective appellate review is best preserved, by affording the appellant a reasonable opportunity to supply the omitted portions of the record. Accordingly, in the exercise of our discretion, under the clear authority conferred upon us by [the appellate rules] we hereby grant the wife-appellant a period of fifteen days from the date of this order within which to supply to this Court, in the form of a supplemental Appendix of Appellant, copies of the complete transcript of trial proceedings below, in default of which the order on interlocutory appeal will stand affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“before us ... do not contain the entire contents of the hearings.... In the posture of the case, we could, as have so many prior decisions, merely indulge the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.