Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 289 SW2D 134 - Smith v. Taylor

Smith v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1992

13 state decisions

7019561960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Crow v. Canty · Krisman v. Unemployment Compensation Commission · 228 Mo. App. 994 - Pioneer Cooperage Co. v. Bland and Foster. · State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. Woolfolk · Clark v. Crown Drug Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the law is well settled that the right to dismiss a cause of action without prejudice under section 510.130 V.A.M.S., is not an absolute right. * * * We agree with defendant that plaintiff did not have an absolute right under the Code to take a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, yet, the right to dismiss has been a well established right throughout all of our procedure. The evidence must show defendant would be injured. We think the mere fact that plaintiff would bring another action against defendant is not such an injury as would justify the court in denying plaintiff’s request to take a voluntary dismissal. Defendant must show that some undue advantage would be given plaintiff by such dismissal or that under the circumstances defendant would lose some right of defense before the injury would justify the trial court’s action.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.