State v. Stallman’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Grim · State v. Dulany · State v. Black · State v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Missouri follows the foreseeability-proximate cause theory of felony murder in interpreting whether a death resulted from the perpetration of a felony. O’Neal [v. State], 236 S.W.3d [91,] 96 [ (Mo.App. E.D.2007) ]. Under that theory, the identity of the actual killer is irrelevant and a defendant may be considered responsible for any deaths that are the natural and proximate result of the commission of a felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cole“unlawful act need not be the immediate cause of death. It is enough that it be a contributing proximate cause, although other contributing causes may have intervened.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Balbirnie“Missouri follows the foreseeability-proximate cause theory of felony murder in interpreting whether a death resulted from the perpetration of a felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Balbirnie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.