Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 A.D. 393

Mayer v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1898-07-01

Appeal, by the defendant, Charles F. Mayer, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 5th day of April, 1898, directing him to serve a bill of particulars.

Decided 1898-07-01

Pee Curiam:

¶1The affidavit upon which the motion for a bill of particulars is based was made by the plaintiff’s attorney only. No reason is given why it was not made by the plaintiff. It has often been held that such an affidavit is entirely insufficient to warrant the granting of a • bill of particulars. (Van Olinda v. Hall, 82 Hun, 357; Gridley v. Gridley, 7 Civ. Proc. Rep. 215.)

¶2For that reason the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars-costs.

¶3Present ■—Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and McLaughlin, JJ.

¶4Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

/29/ad/393 · .json · Public domain