Webb v. Webb's Heirs’s Empirical Analysis
1857
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Porter v. Henderson (1919), Graves v. Wheeler (1913)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Seymour v. Delancey · Seward v. Jackson ex dem. Van Wyck · Milton v. Rowland · Ellis v. Burden · Carroll v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is a repugnance between the introductory recitals in the deed and the granting clause. * * * The general rule is admitted, that parties are estopped from denying the facts recited in their deeds. Neither will they be permitted, in a court of law, to prove a consideration different from that expressed, so as to change the character of the instrument. In the present case, the deed furnishes its own correction. The granting clause determines the interest intended to be conveyed, and prevails over the introductory statement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dickson v. Wildman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.