Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Ala. App. 264

195 So 295

Cunningham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1940

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1940-02-27

Decided 1940-02-27

RICE, Judge.

¶1 Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief here, in which he argues valiantly that the testimony adduced against this appellant was insufficient to support the verdict of guilt returned against him; also, that some hurt-ful errors were committed in the admission, over his objection, of certain bits of testimony.

¶2 But we do not find any bill of exceptions in the transcript; hence the questions raised, as above indicated, cannot be decided by us.

¶3 We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/29/alaapp/264 · .json · Public domain