Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Ala. App. 468 - Glass v. State

29 Ala. App. 468 - Glass v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1973
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 21 Ala. App. 289 - Douglass v. State · Manning v. State · 20 Ala. App. 615 - Parsons v. State · Kilpatrick v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Where, on a trial under an indictment for murder the evidence shows that the defendant shot the deceased in the back while the latter was in the act of running from him, there is shown to exist no necessity real or apparent, which justified the killing, and therefore the defendant in such a case can not set up self defense.’ See also Cobb v. State, 19 Ala.App. 345, 346, 348 , 97 So. 779 ; Mangino v. Todd et al., 19 Ala.App. 486, 491 , 98 So. 323 ; Moon v. State, 21 Ala.App. 111, 112 , 105 So. 427 ; Vaughan v. State, 21 Ala.App. 204 , 107 So. 797 ; Wright v. State, 22 Ala.App. 376 , 115 So. 852 ; Riddle v. State, 25 Ala.App. 142 , 142 So. 680 ; Williams v. State, 26 Ala.App. 529 , 163 So. 668 ; Barnum v. State, 28 Ala.App. 590 , 190 So. 310 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.