Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Ala. App. 604

199 So 739

Braswell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1941

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1941-01-14

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1979

3 state decisions

Relies on Home Ins. Co. v. City of Birmingham · 28 Ala. App. 581 - Griffin v. State · Hewett v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1941-01-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*605 SIMPSON, Judge.

¶1 The appeal is from a judgment of conviction of buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing stolen property, etc. Code 1923, Section 4912. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal being predicated upon the record proper alone. The sole insistence of error' is the refusal of the trial court to give for the defendant a certain written charge, duly requested. Action of the court in refusing such charge is not reviewable without a bill of exceptions. Hewett v. State, 231 Ala. 524, 165 So. 772; Abrams v. State, 236 Ala. 41, 180 So. 774; Brooks v. State, Ala.App., 193 So. 325 ; 1 Griffin v. State, 28 Ala.App. 581, 190 So. 289; Davidson v. State, 26 Ala.App. 164, 155 So. 315; 7 Alabama Digest, Criminal Law, <®=:>1090 (14).

¶2 This court, therefore,' being without authority to consider said insistence and the record proper being regular in all respects, the judgment must be affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

1

¶4 Ante, p. 142.

/29/alaapp/604 · .json · Public domain