Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Ariz. 1 - Smart v. Staunton

Smart v. Staunton’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co. · Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co. · Yosemite Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Emerson · Rush v. French · Emerson v. McWhirter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant did not preserve the evidence, and may, of course, not attack the findings as unsupported thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.