Varnell v. Union Carbide’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2010
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 22 Ark. App. 103 - Boyd v. General Industries · Ragon v. Great American Indemnity Co. · Phillips v. State · Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Siegler · 10 Ark. App. 92 - Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Grooms
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the insurance, whether private or company administered, is provided and funded by the employer the rule announced in Southwestern Bell Telephone Company [ v. Siegler, 240 Ark. 132 , 398 S.W.2d 531 (1966)] should be followed and the employer afforded the right to show, if he can, that the payments were ‘payments of compensation in advance.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.