Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 BR 299 - In re Yoder Co.

In re Yoder Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 1987
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on North American Car Corp. v. Peerless Weighing & Vending Machine Corp. · Matter of Heyward · American Family Insurance Group v. Gumieny (In Re Gumieny)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “According to the note of the Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules, Federal Rule 301 rejects the so-called “bursting bubble” theory, under which a presumption vanishes upon the introduction of evidence that negates the existence of the presumed fact. According to the Federal Rule, when evidence is put forth negating the fact that the presumption tends to support, the presumption still continues and is evidence to be weighed and considered with all of the other evidence in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “entitled to presume that notice has been received once a proper mailing is made, even though the intended recipient testifies that the notice never really came.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Mr. Bratton's law firm did receive and respond to the notice setting debtor's objection to his claim for hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.