Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 CAL 337 - Morrison v. Bowman

Morrison v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1865

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

1 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1994 · most notably United States v. Robbins (1926), 7 Cal. 4th 246 - Burch v. George (1994)

1 district · 53 state decisions

11018651870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payne v. Payne · Beard v. Knox · Townsend v. Corning · Elwell v. Shaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The deceased,’ said the court, ‘had no authority to dispose of but one-half of the property; this he might do to whomsoever he pleased.’ That case was decided in July, 1855, and the decision has never been questioned. It has furnished a rule under which property of vast amount and value has been distributed. We have no doubt of its correctness, and we only affirm and follow it in holding, as we do in the present case, that the plaintiff took one undivided half of the common property in her own right by virtue of the community existing between herself and husband, and that the remaining half was subject to his testamentary disposition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While it is the law that a testator can only dispose of his own property, he may assume to dispose of that which belongs to another, and such disposition may be ratified and confirmed by its owner, by the acceptance, under the will, of a donation, necessarily implying such ratification and confirmation. The act of the testator attempting to dispose of the property of another, and the act of the owner of such property in accepting the benefit provided for him by the testator, united, complete the disposition, which, without the act of confirmation, would be of no effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “clear and manifest implication from the will”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.