Strandt v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently January 2005 · most notably Armenta v. Churchill (1954), 37 Cal. 2d 89 - Miller v. Peters (1951)
3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Opple v. Ray · De La Cuesta v. Calkins · Lutfy v. Lockhart · Cragg v. Los Angeles Trust Co. · L'Esperance v. Sherburne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the operator's negligence is to be determined by the facts existing at the time of the accident, and whether the operator had a license to operate an automobile under the laws of this state is immaterial unless there is some causal relationship between the injuries and the failure to have a license. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Armenta v. Churchill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.