People v. Gruntz’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1125 · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Toibb v. Radloff · Burrus · Ohio v. Kovacs · 47 Cal. 3d 112 - Walker v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Robert Gruntz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.