Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 CONNAPP 207 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably State v. Miller (1993), State v. DeFusco (1993)

60 state decisions

410199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(c) powers. Any municipality shall have the power to do any of the following, in addition to all powers granted to municipalities under the constitution and general statutes . . . “(4) public services. (A) Provide for police protection, regulate and prescribe the duties of the persons providing police protection with respect to criminal matters within the limits of the municipality and maintain and regulate a suitable place of detention within the limits of the municipality for the safekeeping of all persons arrested and awaiting trial and do all other things necessary or desirable for the policing of the municipality . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he question to be resolved concerning the admissibility of derivative evidence is whether, granting establishment of the primary illegality, the evidence to which the objection is made has been come at by exploitation of the initial illegality or instead by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint. . . . Here, even assuming, without deciding, that the Terry stop of the defendant was illegal, we cannot agree that this rendered the gun inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.