Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 DEL 353 - Lowber v. State

Lowber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2019

5 state decisions

1019171920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is not every error that will justify reversal, and it-is not every mistake that may be made in the hurry of a trial court that will warrant the setting aside of the judgment of that tribunal. * * * “In this country it is a general rule in criminal cases that a new trial will not be granted for the erroneous admission or rejection of evidence, where it clearly appears that the defendant could not have been prejudiced thereby. If on the whole record it appears that justice has been done, and there appears no substantial misdirection of the court by which the prisoner’s rights were injuriously affected, the court is not justified in reversing the judgment. "When it appears from the record that the error alleged therein on behalf of the appellant could have worked no injury to him, and could not have changed the result, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed. *_ * * Courts now undertake to judge for themselves of the materiality of evidence found to have been improperly admitted or rejected, and when satisfied that no injustice has been done, and that the verdict would have been the same, with or without such evidence, they have refused a new trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.